<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia and public sector edits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PR Nuggets 8.19.07: Netflix and customer service, the Wikipedia scandal : thegoodthebadthespin.com</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Nuggets 8.19.07: Netflix and customer service, the Wikipedia scandal : thegoodthebadthespin.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=72#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikipedia scandal has spread like wildfire. It&#8217;s extremely tempting to assume an anonymous identity to set the record straight&#8211;or, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikipedia scandal has spread like wildfire. It&#8217;s extremely tempting to assume an anonymous identity to set the record straight&#8211;or, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ryan</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 07:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=72#comment-185</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good point Sam. And I like your idea of a nominated editor &#8211; someone who takes responsibility for the agency page and updates it when necessary (and, unfortunately, also monitors it for vandalism).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Sam. And I like your idea of a nominated editor &ndash; someone who takes responsibility for the agency page and updates it when necessary (and, unfortunately, also monitors it for vandalism).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Farrow</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Farrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=72#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Great post Jason, well done.

I think the distinction needs to be made between anonymous edits to Wikipedia and edits made by logged in contributers of the site (the formers IP addresses are discoverable through the tool, where the latter's are not).

Perhaps public sector organisations could register a corporate user, entrusted to their comms team, to ensure that their own entry is accurate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Jason, well done.</p>
<p>I think the distinction needs to be made between anonymous edits to Wikipedia and edits made by logged in contributers of the site (the formers IP addresses are discoverable through the tool, where the latter&#8217;s are not).</p>
<p>Perhaps public sector organisations could register a corporate user, entrusted to their comms team, to ensure that their own entry is accurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
