Blogging and your media policy

Flickr Creative Commons image: nib.ipernity.comIt is almost inevitable that, right now, there are at least a couple of people in your agency running their own blogs. It is also a pretty safe bet to assume that if you open up your agency’s media policy, you won’t find anything in there about blogging. The policy will be very specific about who can (and can’t) talk to the media, which is a good thing, but it won’t offer you any guidance about how you deal with in-house bloggers.

As I suggested some time ago, in a post on blogging as a public servant:

If people within your organization are blogging (and you really should know who they are), talk to them about their blogs, the scope of their involvement in other social media and try to get a feeling for how they see the boundaries to their self-expression.

The other critical point that I should have added, is that if they do touch –even only occasionally– on work-related issues, then subscribe to their feed and read their blogs. For god’s sake, make sure you are aware of what they are posting…

Mind you, this is not an invitation to crack down on what public servants are doing in their own time (and with their own bandwidth). A good counter example is the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, which has recently issued a blogging policy that is, frankly, a little draconian. The key point to note:

Any CBC employee who wants to start a personal blog which “clearly associates them with CBC/Radio-Canada” now requires their supervisor’s permission.
Inside CBC: the official blog

Should we expect that public servants should get their managers permission before they start blogging if they intend identifying themselves as an employee of a government department? In a word, no. From a blogger’s perspective, I would always disclose to my manager that I blog, and that from time to time I blog about my agency’s business. That is just common courtesy.

Would I expect that someone that reports to me would seek my permission before launching a personal blog that overlaps with their professional interest? Again, no. I would expect that they would discuss the matter with me and, if at any time they felt that they were ‘close to the line’ with a particular post, seek advice about the wisdom of posting it. That is both courteous and smart.

The Code

The principles that guide the behaviour of public servants are laid out in the Code of Conduct. The relevant principle is trustworthiness, specifically:

avoid any activities, work or non-work, that may harm the reputation of our organization or of the State Services.

[...] We must use judgement when exercising our personal democratic rights or voicing professional concerns. We must be careful that we act lawfully, and that we do not misuse official or personal information we have acquired through our work. We must always be careful that our actions do not compromise our organization or our Minister.

It’s the bit about using our judgement that is of particular relevance when you consider the intersection of blogging and your corporate media policy. Public servants are paid to exercise their judgement. To suggest that we are incapable of doing it when we are blogging is as ludicrous as suggesting that we should not be allowed to give presentations in public.

Spokesperson vs Blogger

For those of you that are blogging about work, this does not put you in the position of being an official spokesperson. Yes, it is conceivable that a journalist could cut and paste part of one of your posts into an article — just as they could misquote you when you front your powerpoint deck at a conference. But they won’t be able to introduce your view with the words ‘a spokesperson for the agency said…’

Does that matter? Yes and no. Blogging about something that your agency is involved in is fraught anyway. You had better assume that, at some point, you will be misinterpreted and quoted out of context, because to blithely ignore that possibility is poor judgement.

One point worth noting: publishing a disclaimer on your about page should be seen more as a convention than any sort of iron clad protection against dropping yourself and your agency into the proverbial.

Conclusion

Social media are part of the reality of our professional lives. The best way to ‘manage’ it in your organization is to understand it. Read your colleagues’ blogs, join their networks and start to participate in their conversations. Above all, encourage them to exercise their judgement and help build a culture of engagement rather than one of fear and distrust.

It is only a matter of time before a couple of paragraphs on blogging start to make their way into agency policies (media or some other). It would be a good idea if that policy was written from a position of understanding, rather than a scrambled rush to deal with some new perceived threat to the integrity of your external relations.

As a guide, you can always refer to some private sector corporate blogging guidelines, IBM’s are good; but the bottom line for New Zealand public servants should always be the Code of Conduct.

Photo: nib.ipernity.com

Share this post These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • co.mments
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • ScoopIt

7 Comments

  1. Cj Wells
    Posted August 6, 2007 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    Hi Jason,

    These are good points. Just a quick comment that those engaged in blogging are also likely to be engaged in online social networks of one kind or another. It would be interesting to get your viewpoint of this. Do you, for example, believe media policies need to be widened to include this?

    Cheers
    Cj

  2. Posted August 6, 2007 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Thanks CJ: I was trying to allude to that fact when I said that social media are part of our professional lives. If 3 people are blogging in Agency X, I would put good money on at least 30 posting comments or otherwise contributing to social sites.

    And, no, I don’t believe that media policies should include people commenting on the TradeMe boards, for example. But, if public servants are going to use these sites, they need to exercise their judgement and discretion.

    It might be helpful to focus on the social in social media: you are engaging with a community, so you need to behave in a way that doesn’t bring you (or your agency, if you are talking about stuff that intersects with your job) into disrepute.

  3. Posted August 9, 2007 at 8:54 am | Permalink

    it’s not possible that you could be quoted out of context, it’s entirely likely.

    and becomes more likely the higher you climb on the political totem pole.

    i thoroughly enjoy seeing the blogs of current baby-political junkies. these guys will doubtless have their opinions brought back to visit them when they’re older.

    all public servants should be aware of that happening to them as well. i know i am…

  4. Posted August 9, 2007 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    Thanks Che - one instance where we can be thankful that Google never forgets…

  5. Posted August 9, 2007 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    indeed… some of the more aggressive displays of misogyny for example.

    recorded. forever.

  6. Michael Berger
    Posted August 14, 2007 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Controlling the uncontrollable

    As more and more people enter the domain of Web 2.0/Govt 2.0 etc, the ability to manage what people do, what they say, and how they say it becomes less and less clear. It’s interesting to watch the established (but diminishing) powers that be try to hold back the tide of the future. We’re clearly not at the point in time yet when the natural forces will be let free to flow as they will, and until that time comes, we’re simply doomed to piss off or alienate those whom we need to depend on for our future.

    Demographics don’t lie about where the shifts are taking place. The public sector, never known for its responsiveness or market sensitivity, does seem to be beginning to groan under the pressure. Where will it be an embracing of the future and where will it be a resistant force?

  7. Posted August 14, 2007 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Michael. We are definitely experiencing some growing pains (with more to come), but –as you say– demographics don’t lie.