<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the Internet kill TV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/07/14/tv-and-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/07/14/tv-and-the-internet/</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand Government</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ryan</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/07/14/tv-and-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=67#comment-159</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sam: good points (and always helpful to bolster them with solid numbers). However, and I am guessing that advertisers would be acutely aware of this, if the channel isn't dying, the audience &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; (demographically speaking). The boomers won't be around forever to prop up network TV...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't think that we can just look at NZ revenues - do you restrict your surfing and online activities to .nz? Just take a look at &lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/financials/financials.html?symb=GOOG" title="Google's financial statement" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google's revenues&lt;/a&gt; and you can see where this is heading.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam: good points (and always helpful to bolster them with solid numbers). However, and I am guessing that advertisers would be acutely aware of this, if the channel isn&#8217;t dying, the audience <em>is</em> (demographically speaking). The boomers won&#8217;t be around forever to prop up network TV&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that we can just look at NZ revenues - do you restrict your surfing and online activities to .nz? Just take a look at <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/financials/financials.html?symb=GOOG" title="Google's financial statement" rel="nofollow">Google&#8217;s revenues</a> and you can see where this is heading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Che Tibby</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/07/14/tv-and-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Che Tibby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=67#comment-158</guid>
		<description>okay, okay.. it's not dead yet.

doesn't mean we can't poke it with a stick tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay, okay.. it&#8217;s not dead yet.</p>
<p>doesn&#8217;t mean we can&#8217;t poke it with a stick tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Farrow</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/07/14/tv-and-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Farrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=67#comment-162</guid>
		<description>"push TV" generated &lt;b&gt;$660m&lt;/b&gt; in advertising revenue in NZ last year  (down 4%* from 2005). The web generated &lt;b&gt;$60m&lt;/b&gt; (Up 48%** from 2005).

These figures are from the &lt;a href="http://www.asa.co.nz/" title="Homepage of the Advertising Standards Authority" rel="nofollow"&gt;Advertising Standards Authority&lt;/a&gt;.

Broadcast television in New Zealand is not dead yet.

*Quiet atrophy
**Nearly 50% year on year growth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;push TV&#8221; generated <b>$660m</b> in advertising revenue in NZ last year  (down 4%* from 2005). The web generated <b>$60m</b> (Up 48%** from 2005).</p>
<p>These figures are from the <a href="http://www.asa.co.nz/" title="Homepage of the Advertising Standards Authority" rel="nofollow">Advertising Standards Authority</a>.</p>
<p>Broadcast television in New Zealand is not dead yet.</p>
<p>*Quiet atrophy<br />
**Nearly 50% year on year growth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ryan</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/07/14/tv-and-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=67#comment-161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;q&gt;three or four decent shows?&lt;/q&gt; Even on cable that is a stretch...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><q>three or four decent shows?</q> Even on cable that is a stretch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Che Tibby</title>
		<link>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/07/14/tv-and-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Che Tibby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=67#comment-160</guid>
		<description>pushTV is dead. there is absolutely no reason to sit through days of mindless, endless dross just to get to the three or four decent shows on thetube.

"the thick of it" is remarkably easy to download for example. or so i hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pushTV is dead. there is absolutely no reason to sit through days of mindless, endless dross just to get to the three or four decent shows on thetube.</p>
<p>&#8220;the thick of it&#8221; is remarkably easy to download for example. or so i hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
