Principles for public sector social media

Image of gears - decorativeIf you have worked through your communications strategy, evaluated all of your options and channels and the most appropriate course of action is a social media solution (blog, wiki or podcast), then here are some points that you may want to consider before you rush off and launch.

Please note, I am only covering corporate projects here, if you are a public servant and you want to start your own blog, then these may apply, but the advice is intended for government public affairs staff working on their agency projects.

There are 10 principles to consider:

  1. Sovereignty: do not use an (external) hosted solution, eg blogger. If this is an agency initiative, then you should host the site in the .govt.nz namespace. I would recommend WordPress, as a powerful, extensible and semantic publishing platform. It is also open source, so it is free and easy to deploy, meaning there is no significant cost to the taxpayer to set up.
  2. Access: the site must be Government Web Standards compliant. If it is funded by the taxpayer, then it should be accessible to all New Zealanders. This is another good reason for choosing WordPress as your solution.
  3. Transparency: make it very clear who is posting (do not claim that your CE is writing the posts if they are being ghostwritten by you and your team), and how to contact them, online and off. This is one instance where you are not an anonymous public servant. Similarly, (and I know I don’t need to tell you this) no flogs, astroturf or sockpuppets.
  4. Trust: do not disclaim the content on the blog/wiki/podcast etc. If you are engaging your publics through these media they should be able to expect a straightforward exchange of ideas and information. If your Legal team intend on vetting every post, the venture is doomed.
  5. Fairness: social media is about reciprocity, if you are going to engage and invite comment then accept the good with the bad. Post a very clear comments policy and stick to it. Don’t delete comments because they are critical of your agency or policies.
  6. Timeliness: post regularly and be prepared to engage people when it suits them. This may mean checking comments or making edits after work hours and on weekends — be prepared to make that effort.
  7. Openness: share content that is an honest reflection of your thinking and position. Don’t set up a social media channel to broadcast your risk-averse, legal-approved and comprehensively qa’ed copy. Remember, this is about engaging people, not boring them into apathy…
  8. Ethics: respect what you can legitimately say about your agency/project in public. No matter how small you think your audience, once you hit the ‘publish’ button your content is in the public domain. Make sure you don’t surprise your Minister this way…
  9. Participation: don’t just focus on your site and expect your publics to find, engage and maintain a conversation. Get out among similarly oriented communities and participate there. Post comments, email other bloggers and recognize that your site is only part of the solution.
  10. Integrity: at all times measure your actions against the Code of Conduct. If you think that you are close to the line with a post, or a comment, check with someone who has some distance from the issue — or hold off posting for overnight. Once it is published, there is no taking it back.

Of course, none of this should come as a surprise. In most cases we are just talking about common sense and sound judgement. It is probably not an exhaustive list either, so if you have suggestions, please add them in the comments.

Share this post These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • co.mments
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • ScoopIt

5 Comments

  1. Posted February 20, 2007 at 5:51 am | Permalink

    Great post. I’ve circulated this around to many of my contacts who think about these kinds of things in a government context here.

  2. David Hume
    Posted February 20, 2007 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    Jason, you’ve been on fire lately with this stuff. I’d want to qualify your point about trust though. Surely the voice you use when blogging is a ‘thinking out loud’ voice and not an ‘official agency policy’ voice. Surely that needs to be made clear in a blog at the start? Would making that move count as disclaiming?

    My sense of social media as a public sector productivity (and not just a transparency) tool is that they allow for vagueries and cloudy thinking. The point is to allow the readership to contribute, kick the tires, and sharpen things up, kind of like an always-on focus group. This means making clear that anything you’re posting is always a work in progress that you’re seeking to develop further. It can’t be the official word. That comes out in a press release, doesn’t it?

  3. Posted February 20, 2007 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    Hello from Argentina. Very useful advice. Do you know of any places in the NZ public sector where they have already introduced a blog or a wiki?

    Thanks and regards.

    Ignacio

  4. Posted February 20, 2007 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    David: this is the challenge of new media. Even if the voice is a ‘thinking out loud’ one, the author has to weigh the other principles (specifically 8 and 10) to ensure that, for example, decisions that should be made by the Government are not pre-empted.

    And I do think that, for agency social media projects, the content is part of the ‘offical discourse.’ It is not the same as a press release, but nevertheless, it will be perceived by people as being ‘from government.’ It may not amount to a policy postition, but it will have to stand up to a high level of scrutiny. Transparency (3) would help to clarify this for people.

    Ignacio: thanks for reading. Not much in the way of externally facing projects, but we have dipped our toe in the water.

  5. Che Tibby
    Posted February 20, 2007 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    hmmm. interesting question about transparency. if you open the policy process to input from the public you’ll attract the attention of the kinds of person who:

    a. have lots of computer access
    b. have lots of time to follow online debates.

    this can be a good thing, because they’re sometimes the kinds of people who you want to take an interest in the ideas you’re developing. but… not always.

5 Trackbacks

  1. By Ketcheson.net :: links for 2007-02-20 on February 20, 2007 at 8:19 pm

    […] NPSC Blog | Blog Archive | Principles for public sector social media Two great posts in a row Jason Ryan in New Zealand about blogging and the public sector. (tags: publicsector socialmedia governmentblogging) […]

  2. […] A noteworthy post by the Network of Public Sector Communicators; this entry provides an excellent checklist of how a government agency ought to approach blogging. […]

  3. […] those agencies considering introducing policies I would also recommend the fantastic work of Jason Ryan from the NZ Network of Public Sector Communicators. Jason has been at the forefront of developing […]

  4. By Who’s this Jason Ryan guy? | Web Directions on April 17, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    […] Principles for public sector social media. If your government agency is thinking about starting to blog, you really don’t need to read anything except this document. Ten easy to understand and implement principles that will stand you in good stead with what can be a tricky enterprise. In fact, looking at them again now, I would recommend this list to anyone anywhere who is serious about starting a blog. […]

  5. By Guidelines for social media « Nimble gidgee on April 22, 2008 at 7:45 pm

    […] April 22, 2008 Reading Seb Chan’s post called Updating your social media and staff blog policies on fresh+new lead me to Jason Ryan’s post called Principles for public sector social media […]